Showing posts with label readers letters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label readers letters. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

‘TIMES’ AND THE NAKED LADIES SCAM

The Times of Swaziland expressed surprise and also a little outrage on Monday (4 October 2010) that an American man has conned Swazi women into sending him photos of themselves naked.



What happened was this: The man had letters ‘published in various newspapers in the country [Swaziland]’ and in them he ‘expressed his wish to marry a Swazi woman’.



But it was a scam. He didn’t want a wife; he just wanted photos of women.



What a surprise. What the Times, an independent newspaper in Swaziland, failed to report that it was the newspaper that published the letter in the first place and as far as I recall it was the only one that did (let’s face it there aren’t that many newspapers in the kingdom.)



The letter writer said, ‘I’m not too picky; I just want a woman with a good heart to help me raise my daughter and take good care of me. I make good money so my wife will not need to work or worry about finances.’



The Times should have smelt a rat, but didn’t. Worse than that, the editor in a footnote encouraged the man by writing, ‘We [Swaziland] have beautiful women, who were raised right’. This almost certainly also encouraged women readers to contact the man.



When this was published in December 2009 I accused the Times of pimping for the man. How right I was.



This week the Times is indignant that the man turned out not to be genuine. Some women who contacted him were left upset.



Perhaps the editor of the Times would like to offer them – and his readers – an apology for being so irresponsible as to publish the letter in the first place.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

POLICE 'POLICY TO BEAT MARCHERS'

Swaziland police officers are forced by their superiors to beat up legitimate demonstrators and marchers ‘even if they are peaceful’.



This evidence that Swaziland’s police force is being used by the state against its own people comes from a serving police officer.



The police officer, who has nine years in the job, says, ‘I was posted in the department which mostly deals with riots, including protesters and marchers.



‘Whenever I heard that a march would take place, I would feel like crying.



‘The reason was that my bosses would tell us to go and disrupt as well as beat up the protestors, even if they are peaceful.



‘This was usually determined by the main agenda or petition. If it was political, even if they would carry flowers, we would disperse them.’



The comments come from the officer (who gives his full name), writing in the Times of Swaziland, the kingdom’s only independent daily newspaper.



He says, ‘As a police officer I am forced to beat innocent people. I am not happy. If it was not for my family I would resign from such a job. I would rather live in poverty than beat people up for no good reason.’



To read his full account click here.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

STILL NO NEW SWAZILAND UNIVERSITY

Maybe it’s a coincidence, or maybe it’s a campaign, but the Times of Swaziland published two letters from readers on the same day praising Limkokwing University and pleading for it to open up a campus in Swaziland.



Limkokwing is a private university based in Malaysia that is expanding rapidly across the world.



The university has an on-off, on-off relationship with Swaziland and has been promising to set up in the kingdom for a couple of years now. But every time it sets a deadline the date comes and goes, but no university appears.



The latest deadline (missed again) was next month (February 2010).



But now the Swaziland Minister of Education and Training Wilson Ntshangase has confirmed Limkokwing will not be opening in Swaziland any time soon



‘There are a lot of issues that we still have to iron out before they can open. Furthermore, these guys are now making ridiculous demands which they did not make when they first came here. For instance, they now want us to pay scholarships for 1000 students for ten years! They also want to be exempted from paying tax and not be required to pay rentals for the premises they want to occupy,’ he told the Weekend Observer, a newspaper in effect owned by King Mswati III.



Limkokwing has a controversial history of global expansion. When it went into Botswana in 2007 it was beset with complaints about the poor quality of teaching and concerns over whether it was good enough to be called a ‘university’.



It originally promised to set up in Swaziland if the Swazi Government put forward E3million (about 430,000 US dollars) to pay the scholarship of students.



That money has not been paid, so – unsurprisingly since Limkokwing is a business and not a charity (as many private universities are) – no campus has yet opened. When the Weekend Observer visited the site of the proposed campus in Mbabane, Swaziland’s capital, it found, ‘The entire premises are so terribly bushy and resemble an abandoned zoo’.



Swaziland has only one university, the state-run University of Swaziland which has King Mswati, sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, as Chancellor. One of his (many) half-brothers Prince Phinda is chair of the governing council.



For many years there have been doubts about whether the kingdom which has a population of one million people, 70 percent of whom live in abject poverty, earning less than one US dollar a day, can afford a university.



Personally, I don’t think it can so there’s no chance that the Swazi Government can come up with scholarships for Limkokwing. Only this month the Swazi Government forced budget cuts of 14 percent on all departments in an effort to stave off a financial meltdown in the kingdom.



Even if the money was available, I don’t think Limkokwing is the answer to Swaziland’s need for highly educated people as its credentials as an institution of high learning are in doubt.



Recently the university advertised for lecturing staff to teach at the 30 universities it says it will set up across the world ‘over the next few years’. Potential staff were required to have at least a bachelor degree and some teaching experience. Hardly the qualifications usually expected of a university lecturer.